<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weight Watcher Points for Beer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onemorepound.com/2009/04/27/weight-watcher-points-for-beer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onemorepound.com/2009/04/27/weight-watcher-points-for-beer/</link>
	<description>Helping fight weight problems one pound at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://onemorepound.com/2009/04/27/weight-watcher-points-for-beer/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorepound.com/?p=93#comment-537</guid>
		<description>For some reason Guinness doesn&#039;t publish nutrition info on their website. There are a couple of website that I reference for things that I can&#039;t find info for on the manufacturers website. Of the three, two of them state that a pint has 210 calories and the other says 196 calories, all of which would make it 4 points. I will have to check the package next time I&#039;m in a store and see what it says. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

Here are my sources:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://caloriecount.about.com/calories-guinness-beer-i70036&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Calorie Count&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfitnesspal.com/nutrition-facts-calories/guinness-draught&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fitnesspal&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailyplate.com/nutrition-calories/food/guinness/draught-stout-beer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TheDailyPlate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason Guinness doesn&#8217;t publish nutrition info on their website. There are a couple of website that I reference for things that I can&#8217;t find info for on the manufacturers website. Of the three, two of them state that a pint has 210 calories and the other says 196 calories, all of which would make it 4 points. I will have to check the package next time I&#8217;m in a store and see what it says. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.</p>
<p>Here are my sources:<br />
<a href="http://caloriecount.about.com/calories-guinness-beer-i70036" rel="nofollow">Calorie Count</a><br />
<a href="http://www.myfitnesspal.com/nutrition-facts-calories/guinness-draught" rel="nofollow">Fitnesspal</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thedailyplate.com/nutrition-calories/food/guinness/draught-stout-beer" rel="nofollow">TheDailyPlate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://onemorepound.com/2009/04/27/weight-watcher-points-for-beer/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorepound.com/?p=93#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bruce...I&#039;ll have to check into that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bruce&#8230;I&#8217;ll have to check into that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://onemorepound.com/2009/04/27/weight-watcher-points-for-beer/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorepound.com/?p=93#comment-534</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s 170 calories in a pint of Guinness Draught, according to several web sites and an ad campaign that I barely remember. So that would make it 3 points, not 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s 170 calories in a pint of Guinness Draught, according to several web sites and an ad campaign that I barely remember. So that would make it 3 points, not 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
